Mario Salieri Filmes Streaming

STORY" THE SECRET OF THE WHITE WOLF "

The secret of the white wolf View more

presentations from RATIBRON .

Courel For the lands of living for many, many years a wolf pack which was a huge white wolf head. One day the wolf took several calves from a block, so the people of the village ordered a raid to hunt.

When the dogs were with the group, the white wolf ordered them to yours flee. Herself faced dogs. He got beat, but the arrival of the guns ended his life. The men, content with their triumph over the animal, tore the skin to teach its neighbors as a sign of his powers and then sell it.

On arrival at the village made a party to celebrate. But, when it was all quiet and people slept in their homes, awoke frightened by the howling of wolves could be heard very, very close.

hunters peered at the windows with their guns to kill them, but only saw shadows that disappeared into the darkness of night. And night after night, the wolves turned and disappeared for the day.

A woman with a reputation for wise told everyone who came by the wolf, who had to wear the skin into the woods and bushes to throw over the moon with its light touch.

They did and that night they heard the screams, but did not sound in the village but in the forest, where they had left the skin of the wolf. The wolf cried all night to his queen and then buried in the depths of the place. They

wise women that white wolf has never disappeared. They say that in the full moon returns to Courel and travels with his herd. No longer howls. The changes produced by man in his dominions was left speechless.

The great white wolf found another way to talk to good people: in the full moon enters the dreams of people and walk through them. If you are afraid to see her and scream, the wolf did not visit on dreams. But who is not frightened by his presence the great white wolf makes a gift.

With his voice, no longer cries but beautiful sounds, teaches them to sing, speak, recite, tell stories, stories ... bewitching who will listen.

Blessed white wolf! May this coming year does not leave our dream to continue the magical world of storytelling!

Maltipoo And Seizures

Alexis Texas In Lycra

The possible illegality of a state of alarm by the government decreed

Hi all,

First I would like to apologize for the lateness in submitting this entry, I had prepared a few days ago, but for various reasons have not been published until now.

What I intend to today's post is to try to shed some light, especially considering people who have no legal knowledge on what this the state of alarm that the government ordered about 15 days ago because of the wildcat strike of air traffic controllers, that is, knowing what , what I wanted to use the Government and if your approach was correct under the laws and the Constitution without evaluating its political reasonableness.

As to its nature, is a state of alarm an exceptional state that the Constitution referred to in art. 116 paragraph 1 and 2, which only indicates that it will be an Organic Law which regulates it (a law must be approved with certain enhanced parliamentary majority) and that "the state of emergency is declared by the Government by decree agreed in Council of Ministers for a period of fifteen days, informing the Congress of Deputies, which met immediately, and without whose consent shall not be extended that deadline. The decree shall specify the territorial scope to extend the effects of the declaration . Therefore, since must go to the Organic Law 4 / 1981, 1 June, the states of alert, emergency and site, we found that the regulation own Alrama State is contained in the arts. 4 to 12 of that law, I will not reproduce here for reasons of space and where I will not delve into this point because they are easy to understand for anyone to read.

Regarding the Government's intention to decree it, we can highlight two: a) to "replace" the civilian controllers who did not attend his post by military controllers (which they could not do without ) and b) to enable criminal sanctions for drivers' strike covert. " These possibilities are reflected in the aforementioned Law, for the sake models following items:

1. art. 9.1 in relation to civilian drivers put under direct government control, the competent authority referred : "On the declaration of a state of alarm all the civil authorities of public administration of the territory affected by the declaration, members of the police forces of the Autonomous Communities and local government, and other staff and service workers the same , be under the direct orders of the authority jurisdiction as is necessary for the protection of persons , property and places may impose extra services for its duration or nature ".
2. Article 10, for the purposes of criminal punishment and administrative power Civilian controllers to "dissidents": "Uno.El failure or resistance to the orders of the competent authority in the state of alarm will be punished in accordance with the provisions of the law. Two. If these acts were committed by officers, the authorities may immediately suspend the exercise of their duties, from, in case the fault of both the judge and notify the immediate superior appropriate for the purposes of disciplinary proceedings. "
3. Article 11, particularly paragraph e), in order to be able to use military personnel to replace civilian controllers"

"Notwithstanding the provisions in the previous article , the decree declaring a state of alarm, or events during their lifetime are issued, they shall consider the following measures:

• a) Limit the movement and stay of persons or vehicles at times and places determined, or conditioned on the fulfillment of certain requirements.
• b) temporary requisition practice all kinds of goods and impose mandatory personal benefits.
• c) intervene and temporarily occupy industries, factories, workshops, farms or premises of any nature, except private homes, taking notice to the ministries concerned.
• d) limit or ration the use of services or the use of staples.
• e) Provide the necessary orders to ensure market supply and operation of services and production facilities affected by the paragraph D of article four . "
  

; working air controller Madrid-Barajas

In my opinion, the most important point is the last, for if the government has saved the need to respect the Constitution and laws. On respect for the Constitution, there seems no serious problems, since the Constitution, as we have seen, only governs who should decree (the Council of Ministers), the maximum duration (15 days) and the possibility of extension with authorization of Congress, all requirements met. However, with regard to respect for the special rule governing the state of alarm (the Organic Law that we have mentioned before) arise and considerable doubt respecting the Government to the letter of the law. Looking at the art.4 of the Organic Act, we can see that there include reasons why you can declare a state of alarm, they are limited grounds and numerus clausus , or what is, that out of those cases can not do such a thing are:

"The Government, in exercise of the powers conferred on it by Article 116.2 the Constitution may declare a state of alarm, in whole or part of the country , whenever any of the following serious alterations of normality:

1. disasters, public calamity or misfortune, such as earthquakes, floods, urban and forest fires or major accidents.
2. health crises such as epidemics and severe pollution situations.
3. cessation of essential public services to the community, if not to ensure the provisions of Articles 28.2 and 37.2 of the Constitution , and either of the other circumstances or situations contained in this article . Situations
4. shortages of basic necessity. "

pointed Bold paragraph c), it seems that is where the government is based. That airspace security is an essential public service is beyond all doubt, and have not been guaranteed the provisions of ss. 28.2 and 37.2 of the Constitution (relating to minimum services) is equally glaring. What happens is that art. 4, c) not only requires a service is stopped, as some have argued, but also it also possesses one of the other circumstances of art. 4-paragraphs a), b) d) - which have evidently not been given. It should be noted that the rule says, "and", not "o", and in the interpretation of the standards except question of judicial interpretation has not been 8que), should be getting the wording of the Act and most state of alarm when accompanied by other restrictions on rights to citizens and, sinsisto in this is an exceptional state, which for now has never been Decaro in Spain in the democratic period.

From some posts related to the party that supports the government and from some related legal authorities has also defended the position taken by the Executive. It is true that the image and public appreciation of the civilian drivers and chaos generated by your wild and uncontrolled strikes can make understandable that nobody has spoken out very strongly against this decision (except the United Left, which said it is unlawful). Moreover, can be even agree that had to be done about the situation and against the drivers (who had other means of protest), even replacing the privileged, ugly mlavados and civil air traffic controllers attractive military controllers (in photo). But not at any price.

is not acceptable in a democracy so deliberately assume that famous expression of the end justifies the means . Although the cause to deserve it, the rule of law revolves around the idea of \u200b\u200brespect for the rules, they are there for something, to avoid arbitrariness in the decisions of significance intense social and legal. Assume that the state of alarm may be issued against the law interpreting is the same as assuming that defeating ETA commands can be organized and armed groups who act outside the law Although this is already assumed, coincidentally, during the previous socialist government.

also seems unreasonable to extend, as seems to want the Government to date, the state of alarm for this Christmas, as a solution to ensure aviation safety. And it is not because one day the military drivers should leave their posts for civilians to return to them, and I doubt the claims of past have changed by then.

Given that the Government should not give in to blackmail of any lobby, one can not forget that at some point must either remove the figure of the driver, or negotiate with them, because the conflict may be postponed, but will not disappear by decree Alarm States each bridge or vacation time. Otherwise, if the drivers are going to end military retirees AENA, end up seeing images such as the end of this post.

not forget to visit http://cineybso.com

Why Does Your Skin Turn Green After Shaving

The intelligence of our politicians

Hi all,

I have often criticized on this blog the actions of our politicians, whatever color they are. In most cases I do reasoning correspondingly intensive criticism and exposing my truth, especially if the matter was open to discussion. However, there are times when you look where you look, stupidity and bad policy making are not turning back.

When you talk about this or that law (understood as a rule) the result of political action is usually understood to be critical of its consequences, sometimes with varying degrees of tact, a good example is talking about the effects of implementation of the Gender Violence Act. It is also possible, but in a more discreet outside the academic world, that criticism comes with the legislative process referred to and she has been hatching this standard. The case is going to discuss the past, those that show that intelligence and skill of our representatives political falls short of bitumen, a phenomenon the result of prolonged in time, the professionalization policy in the worst possible meanings, the subject of that useless in society that makes a career in politics, which is not known to other merit or dedication (see, for example, Leire Pajin).

As some already know, in Spain the legislative process is a series of steps that should be made to ensure that a standard, regardless of its ideological content (which is always debatable), has a sufficient technical correction, and when I say no technical correction I mean to clarify difficult issues by experts, but the most basic corrections, such as (imaginary) that a law on abortion does not speak of man as a person who may become pregnant. Come on, who knows what they are talking about. This is ensured by editors with alleged commissions specialists appointed by the political groups and, in theory, assigning to the congressional committee (other than experts) Members who know the object in question.

That said, we stand as the central theme. As some may know, recently approved a reform of the Penal Code which comes into force this present month of December. Reform which, among other things, has changed the wording of the crimes of robbery, which are of interest. The current wording of the dwelling house burglaries has been heavily influenced by an amendment of the Popular Party, who justified this (read it, but not much entereis you right now):

"Today (...) proliferate dwelling house burglaries in which very often is sought by the authors that the residents are inside the house, hoping to get even, to get location information safes or valuable effects. Also, just to get that information is also very common to be deployed with great violence very serious consequences for the victims.

The current status of the Penal Code stipulates that, contrary to the legislation prior to Reform 95, the aggravation of an inhabited house is only applicable to armed robbery. In cases as these, in which it is a robbery or intimidation, this aggravation of an inhabited house is referred to in Article 242 of the CP current punishing or threatening violent robbery with a sentence of 2 to 5 years if no weapons or 3 years and 6 months to 5 years if weapons. In short, the current Penal Code does not care that it is a simple "pull" of a bag in the street with minimal violence and a few seconds' duration that an assault "on every rule" to a house, invading the privacy of the dwelling, with serious violence and even prolonged for hours and serious sequences representing psychological aggression in the home.

Hence the need for a reform of Article 242 of the Code Criminal re-establish a deterrent penalty, the aggravating circumstance of dwelling house in the violent robbery. "

Christian Translated, it meant that the PP is:

Before reform The burglary in things (which is stealing breaking - practicing force - security features such as locks, doors, safes ...) apply a higher penalty when the theft was committed "in an inhabited house," This does not necessarily mean that if they came home to rob the inhabitants had to be there at that time, according to art. 241.2 of the Criminal Code defines these effects as a dwelling house "all hostel dwelling constitutes one or more people, but accidentally it be absent when the robbery takes place ." Come on, that if you come to rob house breaking the door with an ax and you're not, those types are subject to a penalty.

What seems very concerned that the PP is that when the theft occurred through violence or intimidation on people the Code does not expressly say that if it occurred in an inhabited house had more trouble. The reason for this omission was that the three chestnut cared Code you enter to steal home while being in (and the greatest danger that entails). Omitted because it was understood (quite rightly, in my opinion) that when such a thing happened, the thief lord or lady committed at least two crimes, robbery with violence or intimidation and burglary, whose sentences were accumulated in a formula called penological medial contest not to be explained. The logic of this way of understanding things is overwhelming: while the burglary in things not essential to commit to the inhabitant is in the house and although it is does not have to be violence or intimidation (they can go home , steal and do not learn because I am sleeping), when we speak of robbery with violence or intimidation on people in a household will be that it is essential to be committed they are inside, because if not I will say against whom they will use violence or intimidation .. And if they're at home, entered without permission attentive hopelessly against the privacy of residents, which makes clear that it is impossible to enter a house and use violence and intimidation on them without committing burglary. Also going with the assumptions that under PP, did not protect the code, ie, in which those threats crystallized in violence or in which people were being held inside, were added crimes of injury or if the detention illegal.

Cacos hyper able to get into your house and threaten you without you knowing about caught red-handed by a deputy of the PP

As we have seen, is that, as claimed by the PP , the same code would give a flip of a bag a ticket at home. Rather, it appears that Messrs. PP deputies and senators they dont know what they're talking than not, provided launch populist messages and hung medals. But the most serious of all is that these gentlemen of the PP (which could be also any other party, I insist on this) do not know even what we had before. No. The trouble is that with the amendment so passionately defended, flying for the good of citizens helpless against the accursed sociatas who made a softie Code, in effect introducing the aggravation for robbery with violence and intimidation in dwelling house, but - oh, and here I have to hold back the laughter to the same penalty that was the old contest-raid theft. So where is this "deterrent penalty" that procalamaban if the penalty is the same?, "Our politicians have brains if they can not know where they came from or where they go?, Do we deserve a political class that change by changing to seem to be doing something ? . And ignoring all cases where simply copy and paste without adapting EU legislation (what will be esfirzar a bit), resulting in words like "recovery" products, when it should say "recycling."

What frightens me deeply is that if one looks so simple, legislatively speaking, the blunder is that, what about more complex rules?.

Regards to all Visit my http://cineybso.com