Courel For the lands of living for many, many years a wolf pack which was a huge white wolf head. One day the wolf took several calves from a block, so the people of the village ordered a raid to hunt.
When the dogs were with the group, the white wolf ordered them to yours flee. Herself faced dogs. He got beat, but the arrival of the guns ended his life. The men, content with their triumph over the animal, tore the skin to teach its neighbors as a sign of his powers and then sell it.
On arrival at the village made a party to celebrate. But, when it was all quiet and people slept in their homes, awoke frightened by the howling of wolves could be heard very, very close.
hunters peered at the windows with their guns to kill them, but only saw shadows that disappeared into the darkness of night. And night after night, the wolves turned and disappeared for the day.
A woman with a reputation for wise told everyone who came by the wolf, who had to wear the skin into the woods and bushes to throw over the moon with its light touch.
They did and that night they heard the screams, but did not sound in the village but in the forest, where they had left the skin of the wolf. The wolf cried all night to his queen and then buried in the depths of the place. They
wise women that white wolf has never disappeared. They say that in the full moon returns to Courel and travels with his herd. No longer howls. The changes produced by man in his dominions was left speechless.
The great white wolf found another way to talk to good people: in the full moon enters the dreams of people and walk through them. If you are afraid to see her and scream, the wolf did not visit on dreams. But who is not frightened by his presence the great white wolf makes a gift.
With his voice, no longer cries but beautiful sounds, teaches them to sing, speak, recite, tell stories, stories ... bewitching who will listen.
Blessed white wolf! May this coming year does not leave our dream to continue the magical world of storytelling!
The possible illegality of a state of alarm by the government decreed
Hi all,
First I would like to apologize for the lateness in submitting this entry, I had prepared a few days ago, but for various reasons have not been published until now.
What I intend to today's post is to try to shed some light, especially considering people who have no legal knowledge on what this the state of alarm that the government ordered about 15 days ago because of the wildcat strike of air traffic controllers, that is, knowing what , what I wanted to use the Government and if your approach was correct under the laws and the Constitution without evaluating its political reasonableness.
As to its nature, is a state of alarm an exceptional state that the Constitution referred to in art. 116 paragraph 1 and 2, which only indicates that it will be an Organic Law which regulates it (a law must be approved with certain enhanced parliamentary majority) and that "the state of emergency is declared by the Government by decree agreed in Council of Ministers for a period of fifteen days, informing the Congress of Deputies, which met immediately, and without whose consent shall not be extended that deadline. The decree shall specify the territorial scope to extend the effects of the declaration . Therefore, since must go to the Organic Law 4 / 1981, 1 June, the states of alert, emergency and site, we found that the regulation own Alrama State is contained in the arts. 4 to 12 of that law, I will not reproduce here for reasons of space and where I will not delve into this point because they are easy to understand for anyone to read.
Regarding the Government's intention to decree it, we can highlight two: a) to "replace" the civilian controllers who did not attend his post by military controllers (which they could not do without ) and b) to enable criminal sanctions for drivers' strike covert. " These possibilities are reflected in the aforementioned Law, for the sake models following items:
art. 9.1 in relation to civilian drivers put under direct government control, the competent authority referred : "On the declaration of a state of alarm all the civil authorities of public administration of the territory affected by the declaration, members of the police forces of the Autonomous Communities and local government, and other staff and service workers the same , be under the direct orders of the authority jurisdiction as is necessary for the protection of persons , property and places may impose extra services for its duration or nature ".
Article 10, for the purposes of criminal punishment and administrative power Civilian controllers to "dissidents": "Uno.El failure or resistance to the orders of the competent authority in the state of alarm will be punished in accordance with the provisions of the law. Two. If these acts were committed by officers, the authorities may immediately suspend the exercise of their duties, from, in case the fault of both the judge and notify the immediate superior appropriate for the purposes of disciplinary proceedings. "
Article 11, particularly paragraph e), in order to be able to use military personnel to replace civilian controllers"
"Notwithstanding the provisions in the previous article , the decree declaring a state of alarm, or events during their lifetime are issued, they shall consider the following measures:
a) Limit the movement and stay of persons or vehicles at times and places determined, or conditioned on the fulfillment of certain requirements.
b) temporary requisition practice all kinds of goods and impose mandatory personal benefits.
c) intervene and temporarily occupy industries, factories, workshops, farms or premises of any nature, except private homes, taking notice to the ministries concerned.
d) limit or ration the use of services or the use of staples.
e) Provide the necessary orders to ensure market supply and operation of services and production facilities affected by the paragraph D of article four . "
; working air controller Madrid-Barajas
In my opinion, the most important point is the last, for if the government has saved the need to respect the Constitution and laws. On respect for the Constitution, there seems no serious problems, since the Constitution, as we have seen, only governs who should decree (the Council of Ministers), the maximum duration (15 days) and the possibility of extension with authorization of Congress, all requirements met. However, with regard to respect for the special rule governing the state of alarm (the Organic Law that we have mentioned before) arise and considerable doubt respecting the Government to the letter of the law. Looking at the art.4 of the Organic Act, we can see that there include reasons why you can declare a state of alarm, they are limited grounds and numerus clausus , or what is, that out of those cases can not do such a thing are:
"The Government, in exercise of the powers conferred on it by Article 116.2 the Constitution may declare a state of alarm, in whole or part of the country , whenever any of the following serious alterations of normality:
disasters, public calamity or misfortune, such as earthquakes, floods, urban and forest fires or major accidents.
health crises such as epidemics and severe pollution situations.
cessation of essential public services to the community, if not to ensure the provisions of Articles 28.2 and 37.2 of the Constitution , and either of the other circumstances or situations contained in this article . Situations
shortages of basic necessity. "
pointed Bold paragraph c), it seems that is where the government is based. That airspace security is an essential public service is beyond all doubt, and have not been guaranteed the provisions of ss. 28.2 and 37.2 of the Constitution (relating to minimum services) is equally glaring. What happens is that art. 4, c) not only requires a service is stopped, as some have argued, but also it also possesses one of the other circumstances of art. 4-paragraphs a), b) d) - which have evidently not been given. It should be noted that the rule says, "and", not "o", and in the interpretation of the standards except question of judicial interpretation has not been 8que), should be getting the wording of the Act and most state of alarm when accompanied by other restrictions on rights to citizens and, sinsisto in this is an exceptional state, which for now has never been Decaro in Spain in the democratic period.
From some posts related to the party that supports the government and from some related legal authorities has also defended the position taken by the Executive. It is true that the image and public appreciation of the civilian drivers and chaos generated by your wild and uncontrolled strikes can make understandable that nobody has spoken out very strongly against this decision (except the United Left, which said it is unlawful). Moreover, can be even agree that had to be done about the situation and against the drivers (who had other means of protest), even replacing the privileged, ugly mlavados and civil air traffic controllers attractive military controllers (in photo). But not at any price.
is not acceptable in a democracy so deliberately assume that famous expression of the end justifies the means . Although the cause to deserve it, the rule of law revolves around the idea of \u200b\u200brespect for the rules, they are there for something, to avoid arbitrariness in the decisions of significance intense social and legal. Assume that the state of alarm may be issued against the law interpreting is the same as assuming that defeating ETA commands can be organized and armed groups who act outside the law Although this is already assumed, coincidentally, during the previous socialist government.
also seems unreasonable to extend, as seems to want the Government to date, the state of alarm for this Christmas, as a solution to ensure aviation safety. And it is not because one day the military drivers should leave their posts for civilians to return to them, and I doubt the claims of past have changed by then.
Given that the Government should not give in to blackmail of any lobby, one can not forget that at some point must either remove the figure of the driver, or negotiate with them, because the conflict may be postponed, but will not disappear by decree Alarm States each bridge or vacation time. Otherwise, if the drivers are going to end military retirees AENA, end up seeing images such as the end of this post.
I have often criticized on this blog the actions of our politicians, whatever color they are. In most cases I do reasoning correspondingly intensive criticism and exposing my truth, especially if the matter was open to discussion. However, there are times when you look where you look, stupidity and bad policy making are not turning back.
When you talk about this or that law (understood as a rule) the result of political action is usually understood to be critical of its consequences, sometimes with varying degrees of tact, a good example is talking about the effects of implementation of the Gender Violence Act. It is also possible, but in a more discreet outside the academic world, that criticism comes with the legislative process referred to and she has been hatching this standard. The case is going to discuss the past, those that show that intelligence and skill of our representatives political falls short of bitumen, a phenomenon the result of prolonged in time, the professionalization policy in the worst possible meanings, the subject of that useless in society that makes a career in politics, which is not known to other merit or dedication (see, for example, Leire Pajin).
As some already know, in Spain the legislative process is a series of steps that should be made to ensure that a standard, regardless of its ideological content (which is always debatable), has a sufficient technical correction, and when I say no technical correction I mean to clarify difficult issues by experts, but the most basic corrections, such as (imaginary) that a law on abortion does not speak of man as a person who may become pregnant. Come on, who knows what they are talking about. This is ensured by editors with alleged commissions specialists appointed by the political groups and, in theory, assigning to the congressional committee (other than experts) Members who know the object in question.
That said, we stand as the central theme. As some may know, recently approved a reform of the Penal Code which comes into force this present month of December. Reform which, among other things, has changed the wording of the crimes of robbery, which are of interest. The current wording of the dwelling house burglaries has been heavily influenced by an amendment of the Popular Party, who justified this (read it, but not much entereis you right now):
"Today (...) proliferate dwelling house burglaries in which very often is sought by the authors that the residents are inside the house, hoping to get even, to get location information safes or valuable effects. Also, just to get that information is also very common to be deployed with great violence very serious consequences for the victims.
The current status of the Penal Code stipulates that, contrary to the legislation prior to Reform 95, the aggravation of an inhabited house is only applicable to armed robbery. In cases as these, in which it is a robbery or intimidation, this aggravation of an inhabited house is referred to in Article 242 of the CP current punishing or threatening violent robbery with a sentence of 2 to 5 years if no weapons or 3 years and 6 months to 5 years if weapons. In short, the current Penal Code does not care that it is a simple "pull" of a bag in the street with minimal violence and a few seconds' duration that an assault "on every rule" to a house, invading the privacy of the dwelling, with serious violence and even prolonged for hours and serious sequences representing psychological aggression in the home.
Hence the need for a reform of Article 242 of the Code Criminal re-establish a deterrent penalty, the aggravating circumstance of dwelling house in the violent robbery. "
Christian Translated, it meant that the PP is:
Before reform The burglary in things (which is stealing breaking - practicing force - security features such as locks, doors, safes ...) apply a higher penalty when the theft was committed "in an inhabited house," This does not necessarily mean that if they came home to rob the inhabitants had to be there at that time, according to art. 241.2 of the Criminal Code defines these effects as a dwelling house "all hostel dwelling constitutes one or more people, but accidentally it be absent when the robbery takes place ." Come on, that if you come to rob house breaking the door with an ax and you're not, those types are subject to a penalty.
What seems very concerned that the PP is that when the theft occurred through violence or intimidation on people the Code does not expressly say that if it occurred in an inhabited house had more trouble. The reason for this omission was that the three chestnut cared Code you enter to steal home while being in (and the greatest danger that entails). Omitted because it was understood (quite rightly, in my opinion) that when such a thing happened, the thief lord or lady committed at least two crimes, robbery with violence or intimidation and burglary, whose sentences were accumulated in a formula called penological medial contest not to be explained. The logic of this way of understanding things is overwhelming: while the burglary in things not essential to commit to the inhabitant is in the house and although it is does not have to be violence or intimidation (they can go home , steal and do not learn because I am sleeping), when we speak of robbery with violence or intimidation on people in a household will be that it is essential to be committed they are inside, because if not I will say against whom they will use violence or intimidation .. And if they're at home, entered without permission attentive hopelessly against the privacy of residents, which makes clear that it is impossible to enter a house and use violence and intimidation on them without committing burglary. Also going with the assumptions that under PP, did not protect the code, ie, in which those threats crystallized in violence or in which people were being held inside, were added crimes of injury or if the detention illegal.
Cacos hyper able to get into your house and threaten you without you knowing about caught red-handed by a deputy of the PP
As we have seen, is that, as claimed by the PP , the same code would give a flip of a bag a ticket at home. Rather, it appears that Messrs. PP deputies and senators they dont know what they're talking than not, provided launch populist messages and hung medals. But the most serious of all is that these gentlemen of the PP (which could be also any other party, I insist on this) do not know even what we had before. No. The trouble is that with the amendment so passionately defended, flying for the good of citizens helpless against the accursed sociatas who made a softie Code, in effect introducing the aggravation for robbery with violence and intimidation in dwelling house, but - oh, and here I have to hold back the laughter to the same penalty that was the old contest-raid theft. So where is this "deterrent penalty" that procalamaban if the penalty is the same?, "Our politicians have brains if they can not know where they came from or where they go?, Do we deserve a political class that change by changing to seem to be doing something ? . And ignoring all cases where simply copy and paste without adapting EU legislation (what will be esfirzar a bit), resulting in words like "recovery" products, when it should say "recycling."
What frightens me deeply is that if one looks so simple, legislatively speaking, the blunder is that, what about more complex rules?.
Two examples of low professionalism of our journalists: (I) Introduction and Sauca
Hello everyone,
In Spain there are three major interrelated problems that hinder our progress as a state, namely: a) as a people, we are sleepy intellectually and our level of social demand is really low, besides being involved in a process aldeanización transpires to the sound of what about mine? on issues that affect us all; b) the press, which should exert a work in any field information with accuracy and precision, is little more than a transmission belt plurifica political slogans and ideas that flow directly their masters or information without contrast which urban legend come true, so that its audit work and social policy is destroyed and c) the political class as a result of the absence of vigilant citizens and journalists real made and unmade at will, impoverishing the civil society, dishonoring the public and preventing the real development. It's about the second issue on which I now put the spotlight.
is easy to agree that the main task of the journalist is to inform, even before that of opinion, as to assess their opinions before we know what you think about . To report, the journalist must gathering information, but this is not enough, must submit to a trial value, an accuracy rating if it is not possible to verify its accuracy with precision, ruling that does not exceed this trial and that issuing the professional information to consider. Moreover, in the faculty the journalist is taught to do just that, to select and process the information it manages. Thus the difference between a journalist and a contertulio bar or coffee anyone is that while the prosecution first external information and expands the second trial issues of value on an event or situation affecting over obtaining personal information, which will have a value determined by the origin of this information (for example, a surgeon can discuss over coffee matters within his field and his opinion is qualified, if the discussion is about the same and the raider it brings to the table views based on what your neighbor has told devoted to trade Florists, opinion is not qualified, but is entitled to express it). This means that in the case of contertulio is the interlocutor who must ponder what gives importance to the trial of security issued. However, the journalist when he presents the information, it is assumed that at least knows what he's talking , because its function is to distribute accurate information to society, despite the redundancy, as a country have an informed society, of no use if the journalist disseminates false. What justifies the existence of the journalist is just spare the city the task of figuring out what is happening and to filter what is true or unquestionably true of false.
I said in the previous paragraph is an obstacle to its credibility by looking at the reality of the media in Spain and the generality of professionals who work in them, or at least the vast majority of which write or speak in the most popular newspaper, radio and television. I mean inevitably to the generality of professionals from the sector because it traditionally has been a subtle difference between the serious press and other media, be identified first with total clarity the major general newspapers (El País, El Mundo, La Vanguardia ...) and related media, encompassing the second to and tabloid gossip, leaving a sort of limbo in the sports media and event, because neither is as bad as information "heart" or is so serious and chronic policy. What sí es común es la omnipresente frase "yo soy periodista" en cuanto se pone en duda la tarea de cualquiera de ellos, como si dedicarse a esa profesión les diera un carnet de ser superior y una autoridad moral que autoriza a decir cualquier cosa porque "es información" o "a la gente le interesa este asunto". Lo cual pone en evidencia que, a diferencia de lo que nos quieren hacer creer, es la profesión de periodista en España la que está perdiendo, porque sea cual sea la naturaleza de la información con que se trata, en todos los campos podemos atisbar ejemplos de periodistas con cargos de responsabilidad al frente de programas con gran audiencia o en medios de referencia que en absoluto se toman en serio lo que exponíamos in the second paragraph. They are to journalism what the law would be a lawyer who was unaware of any legal standard.
This pluricidad of sectors of the press that there are bad journalists realize two significant examples, we discuss below:
in the treatment of sports becomings there are many examples of information biased, unabashedly concerned, puerile and designed and written for readers stupid and few of the opposite (although any, Hayles ), more if we talk about football, both in the press Madrid (also called by some, following English tradition of demonizing the enemy, the English media cave ) in the press of Barcelona. I feel bad Although the overall low quality of mainstream and citizen media despotism, my level of anger is much less than when I see the same lack of rigor and preparation on public television, one that (now I) hold with all taxes. The reason is that ultimately the private media need desperately to sell papers / generate audience because they live it, not excusable, but understandable. What unsettles me is that a TV as the 1, no advertising RTVE and should, in all cases and sometimes not, focus on quality, hold as sports editor and as narrator in the Champions League matches to Sauca Sergio (pictured).
Sauca is one of those TV characters you do not know what to do there, because up to be an incompetent must have talent. Although the fund should not lack the virtues, because to get where he has come to be as bad as a journalist at least certainly excels in the art of the rectum lameteo . And before you call me too much, I'll tell you what is the perfect example bad journalist that I referred, referring to the discussion in the excellent book blog Van Gaal, because of the attitude of Sauca during the broadcast of Real Madrid - Milan:
"retransmission Real Madrid-Milan was again a year of neglect, with Sergio Sauca as master of ceremonies. A clear example of dispassionate communicator and can not bring anything interesting to the viewer. [...] The highlight came with the enter the field of Kevin-Prince Boateng, Ghanaian international whose family history is well known since the last World Cup ( own note: Kevin-Prince Boateng is the brother of Jerome Boateng, the first Ghanaian play with the selection and the second with Germany and they are fighting. Both teams played the World Cup and is well known that "curiosity") . [...] [...] Sauca confused this time with Kevin-Prince with his brother Jerome, who plays for Manchester City. A rabbit is committed by anyone, but this was not serious. After a few minutes until someone had to warn Sauca of error. This, shamelessly, called on his colleagues in the study to confirm whether Kevin-Prince was the brother who plays with Ghana or playing with Germany. Both the commentator, Manolo Sanchis, as the three editors located in the box and the bench did exits through the forum. None of the five had no idea. When he finally got the confirmation that Kevin-Prince plays Ghana, Sauca again jump into the mud, "Your brother, who plays for Germany, I think it is at Werder Bremen."
sure many think is a simple mistake, no big deal. And you will be on your right. But that does not prevent it disturbing that a sportswriter, that is, specialized, has not followed an event the likes of World Cup, you do not know in general the staff of one of the leading teams in Europe such as Milan, which, having a team of writers who can document about players, not read what you are prepared or there is no such report, prepare yourself, who, being in the era of new technologies and by having a laptop, Sauca not fit into Google and out of doubt, because, as you see in the pictures, putting "Boateng" in the famous search engine displayed the two brothers and do as well, with clear signs indicating how distinctive military equipment (Kevin Prince Jerôme the first and second) and finally, that without clear this point, put a comment making the wiseacre.
is not, therefore, the error itself, but the lack of preparation and processing of information so critical. Because this man get paid to know more than their viewers, to bring something, because to not provide anything better to watch the game without audio. So if this man does not know more than I do when I see a game (which I usually get my boxes), milk, put to a known, it is not so difficult. Almost all sports bloggers have more extensive knowledge of international football that many alleged journalists. At least more than Eduardo Inda, current supreme juntaletras director of sports daily Marca, which also confused in an editorial to Nigel DeJong, who plays for Manchester City and international black for the Netherlands with Ajax player DeJong, blond guy, fair skin and blue eyes and little or nothing to do with the old. But at least I can punish him by not buying or reading his newspaper website, but is already Sauca?.
What is worse is not the first time the Sauca Sergio good does a bad job, like when Wayne Rooney Kevin Rooney called or named him as Carles Puyol Puyol Francesc. Although not necessary to go back as far back in the same match in which he brought with him from Boateng, eventually concluding that Kevin-Prince is the Gahn plays.
I would be high time that someone TVE call attention to this man who even sends people to see the competing programs, such as when English mistook the World with Street. In the video (also of THE BOOK OF VAN GAAL) can see how it is not a mere slip, but directly not know which program is that it has targeted and has not given the real "Ghana" (pardon the joke easy, I had to) learn to speak or mirárselo before.
I wonder why, like José Manuel Díaz , what have they done guys like Sauca or as the narrator of Channel 9 the other day, casualmenteen in Milan - Real Madrid, delighted us with her wit repeating over and over again that Filippo "Pippo" Inzaghi played a ball that actually did the relay teammate Ruben "Pipo" Deck, former Valencia player, ending with a fireworks worthy of the Fallas in Valencia in humor and laughed saying, before the two goals scored by Inzaghi, who (I translate from Valencia) - the "Pippo" has done to Real Madrid pupa "Pipa" - making mistakes and not just thinking that was funny, but not realize that "El Pipa" Higuain is the father of Real Madrid player, which it is known as "El Pipit".
Maybe and just maybe, tomorrow we see on public television (all) professionals who deserve to be there. Regards
Sergio George Lucas and charismatic villains: Value Mortal (II) Two half-truths
continue with the second installment of the post dedicated to the villains that George Lucas has squandered over the participation in Star Wars. The earlier you can find it here. Let's talk about Darth Maul and Palpatine.
Darth Maul
When the talk turns to charismatic villains that good Lucas has failed to treat or give them due weight, we all come to mind surely the name of Darth Maul. The Sith of the double-bladed sword is the paradigm of road that has been touring the new series, in which the quality of the artistic design of characters and settings have been greatest in exchange for a total reluctance about the script and character development. Notably, not something to be amazed if we understand that Luke is not and never has been a director who knows how to bring the actors. The mythical story is told in the extras of the classic trilogy on DVD in which Harrison Ford and Irvin Kershner tell how Lucas simply said "Do it!. I put there, you just do it" in the sense that it simply actors had read the script and you're done. The basic Differents between the classic trilogy and is current at that Lucas was not synonymous with God, but that was with a crew and actors when they said something was not working; paradigm is the best of the six movies is The Empire Strikes Back, the only one not addressed it. In the development of the first three episodes we see how the technical team designed items with hard work, after weeks of work, displayed almost frightened by Lucas their work while it merely means "not.. That one. Very well, we will continue in three weeks. " Therefore, no one to control mania in Lucas in front of the saga, we have are movies that seal in which the general argument of the film (and I stress the "general" in the sense of "broadly ") and the artwork is the most important thing, forgetting the interpretation of the actors and the motivation of the characters through the neglect of the main weapon of the classic trilogy: his brilliant dialogue, in a few lines defining the nature of the characters and their motivations, to the point of making such absurd credible cold streams as the annihilation of the planet Alderaan and the almost imperceptible signs of pain Leia Pirncesa beyond a shy "nooooo". The agile dialogues serve both to explain the historical references found (lesson teacher Obi-Wan on Tatooine to resume in less than 5 minutes all you need to know) as to frame the characters (Han Solo works almost from the first minute). Thing that shines by its absence in the new trilogy.
That said, follow those same guidelines. Her presence is captivating and enigmatic, the result of his great design that brings a level of charisma brutal. This is greatly appreciated in combat that takes place at the end of Episode I between Maul and the two Jedi. If the classic trilogy as important in fighting duels was not itself but the dialogue and the meaning it had (and, in Episode IV to the conversation between Darth Vader and Obi-Wan; in the V's intention not to kill Vader and Luke's final revelation and VI that the real significance is that Luke duel against itself) in this truly impressive is the choreography, that is, grief itself that establishes two things at a superficial level but clear: 1) The Jedi are very good at handling the lightsaber and 2) Darth Maul is even better and is against the ropes most of the fight. Therefore, this factor of enemy skilled in the arts, skilled and silent Darth Maul gives a perfect aura. For that reason and nothing else then was admired by fans, who wanted to know more about him.
The truth is that despite its popularity, it met the standard except that Darth Vader, all charismatic villain of Star Wars should disappear. The last show hidden Maul and uncertainties about their abilities and motivations as Sith were not enough to recover and Lucas decided to add depth to the character, since it was also easily insertable in Episode II both continuity and by the characteristics of the character: in the first question because we are in a universe full of technology that can be used as a reason of his "resurrection" and the second one, I hardly think that a person skilled in the infiltration and the battle can not get into the plot of attempted murder and alleged intrigue EADLC.
Palpatine
First of all should specify that I mean we saw Emperor Palpatine in Return of the Jedi, as there is a superb villain, very evil and wicked as it fulfills its role in the story to perfection, which is none other than being someone worse than Darth Vader for it to upper end the evil and redemption. Where I think is missed is firmly in the new trilogy, seized the title of this post syndrome and before we developed when we were talking about Darth Maul.
Moving on, maybe I can be rash to say that is a villain that has been extracted all the juice in the new series because, in fact, appears on all new films and make an Machiavellian plan to destroy the Jedi ... or not. Because I understand your machiavellian has nothing, as Machiavelli might be cynical but it was also an intelligent man who judged the passions of men with ease. In my opinion, the loose script of the first three episodes galactic simplifies too much the alleged plan of Palpatine to seize power and become ancillary things that should be important (for example, in the movie Revenge of the Sith is not appreciated with certainty the importance that should be Anakin Skywalker in his plans or the determinant of their treachery, as the vast majority of the dirty work are clones do by enacting the Order 66). I think also of extreme simplicity whole process of persuasion Anakin Skywalker, as the result of creative schizophrenia of George Lucas and final assembly of the film, intermingle decomposed the three bases to give Anakin over to the dark side of the Force: 1) Palpatine can provide the power to save his wife, 2) Palpatine convinced Anakin that the Jedi are not really a force for good and want to galactic domination and 3) Anakin is jealous (love) because he believes that Obi-Wan flirts with Amidala. Of these three, only the latter was finally removed from the film. But this does not remedy the deeply artificial result that Anakin knows Palpatine is a Sith Lord and, therefore is evil, that same knowledge to infer that the only thing that takes Anakin to accept the teachings of Palpatine (which, incidentally, are conspicuous by their absence in the movie) is his immeasurable love for Padme and not, conversely , establishing that the Jedi are evil and are planning to overthrow him, who appears in the final conversation with Obi-Wan, is an argument that lies in the minds of the young Sith. And this without addressing the holes in his supposed plan is foolproof, holes, though, that the Expanded Universe has been in charge of covering tying loose ends that seemed or action that seemed very left to chance. But keep in mind that here we are talking about George Lucas's relationship with its villains and you have to give George Lucas certainly knows little or nothing, or is aware of what is happening in your porpio Universe. Some evidence is in that sense, at least, as when he says in the comments of LVDLS Grievous coughs at the conceptual stage because I wanted a character in "sick", ignoring the fact that the droid General such thing as Mace Windu crushed his chest at the end of the first Clone Wars series.
So, if Palpatine's plan is simple and persuasive skills leave much to be desired, I understand that this impacts negatively on the character, that someone should be displayed as infallible, which acts almost mechanically, and that really causes a profound transformation and reasoned well as an agent of Anakin Skywalker. Do not be a villain operetta easy and predictable.
The next installment will end with the characters and not wasted, but certainly ridiculed, they are not few.
Regards!
PS: I edit to clarify that in Return of the Jedi Richard Marquand is credited director, but in view of Luke's comments about the shooting ("In the end it was quicker to go and do it myself than let what do others ") makes it quite clear that who is really behind the camera is it, hence to say that Episode V is the only one not directed by him.
As the Tico who can not remember his name: "If you're not learning or having fun you're wasting time," it comes out that at this time do not know if I'm doing one or none of the above. Hahaha
You never know what you have until ... clean your room! XD, is that removing the rust caused by rain so I took out all the boxes that I keep under my desk, and if the desktop is that holds all my real desktop as well, if talking to tell stories, let's see, we my baby's PC, my chain to the virtual world that I hate and love at the same time, headphones, escape and link to the same medium that holds me back, full disks things that are kept because I thought that someday I may serve, by the way the 99.99996% of those discs are pirated copies, the screwdriver can not fault my computer is always a screw loose, the cell phone certainly take months and I blocked the signal, the books of Intel processors and I have been looking to start some day my thesis is currently only thoughts are vague, lacking water is always welcome, but could not miss the duck symbol Kua-ko Kua-ko !!!,( that certainly the domain expire, but either way I have to pay not someone please save Kua-ko), the baby cub and tazo hahaha, if someone read so far is that it has nothing to do!, hahaha, a landfill of thoughts on a day where I find inspiration to write my vettotarea the day.
current (II): The lowering of dismissal as solution to the crisis
Hi all,
Before anyone point demagogy of the title, saying that what I'm going to talk about is the thesis that has kept the CEOE that economic recovery requires the lowering of dismissal, as stated in the previous post.
The crux of the matter is that since this famous chaired by another employer equally famous entrepreneur , Gerardo Diaz Ferrán (pictured) has said over and over again (which prevents it from being considered a mistake or an error) which is necessary for the English business sector to recover, and with it employment, it is necessary " reduce the cost of dismissal "dry dismissal, without adjectives. Such a thing has not been well received by workers and unions, of course. But following the English tradition, it has resorted to telling lies that really looking to try to convince the injured not get hurt. Come on, the implementation of the strategy of "Guzmán el Bueno" so many other English institutions have used in the past and even today days, from the Government to the Constitutional Court: Let pounding her well, but do not worry if we stop to explain, will believe it appropriate to do so.
The culmination of this strategy is put into the collective thought the following idea which ignores a wealth of information:
to me, a businessman, I is very expensive to fire a worker- 45 days per year worked, "what my economic recovery difficult and prevents me from hiring more people, both by spending generated as dismissal for trying to avoid having to lay in the future people giving the job now. This, however, does not mean a cut in workers' rights and guarantees at all. You, the unions are wrong. What happens if you do not cheapen the dismissal is that then we have to employ people on temporary contracts, we can not hire permanent because it is very expensive to dismiss. You know that the time simply did not renew the contract. So let's just say I get a much smaller compensation than no. This is good for you boys. And no, it will give us thanks for being so generous, do not deserve.
This is more or less, which from CEOE has been said (1) . But it is curious that some men who are dedicated to the business world can not even specify what type of dismissal want cheaper, although it is not difficult to guess the meaning of the compensation that incomplete quote (45 days per year worked, selfishly ignoring the monthly cap .) Perhaps because to do so, they would duster.
Ladies and Gentlemen, what ladies and gentlemen of the CEOE want to cheapen the Unfair dismissal, which is that when the worker has no responsibility or fault in the dismissal and, moreover, is that when the law does not recognize as justified dismissal. In other words, is when the employer decides to arbitrarily and unjustifiably take the fucking street the worker. No more. There is no debate, because there is no other compensation accompanying dismissal citing the CEOE.
It is more wicked than the unsustainable economic conditions make this type of dismissal, or whatever it is, who can not afford to cut that cost templates. It is, as I said, perverse, because the businesses that have financial problems to justify the dismissal of a worker can turn to PURPOSE OF JOB (up to a certain amount of layoffs in a specified time frame) or known REGULATION OF EMPLOYMENT RECORD (ERE) (if many workers, to understand), which allows to fire a worker for reasons esconómicas with compensation of only 20 days per year worked with a corresponding monthly limit.
What happens is that in order to access these figures, it is necessary to prove with extensive documentation accounting hardship status of the company, which sheds light on your accounts and actions, to what many employers do not want exposure because they have things to hide.
In short, the cessation of the milongas and say, bluntly, that they want to keep fucking the average worker. but worse, as I said, is that they would have us go over all stupid and or convince us that this is accepted, or no work . Sure. And they are sisters of charity.
Two half-truths Today (I): The automobile sector aid
Hi all,
Today I would like to speak to two issues that, while not exactly new, still remain the focus of current information in different media, although in most cases without going into depth. These cases are the alleged assistance to the automotive industry perpetrated by the Central Government headed by JL Zapatero and executed by the autonomous communities, on the one hand, and on the other, put forward the slogan by the CEOE employers that economic recovery is necessary lowering of dismissal.
On the first of the subjects, the half-truth is rather a complete falsehood, which has been in recent dates, but that camouflaged the truth for months with serious damage to many citizens.
As you know all aid to the automotive industry were launched by the executive with the aim of reviving a sector in decline (like many others, affected by the crisis) and consisted, in essence, make a "discount "in the price of the vehicle (by value determined by the Autonomous Communities) when accompanied old vehicle (conditions also determined on the same seniority by the autonomous communities), to promote the sale of vehicles . I put strong emphasis on this because the characterization of aid to the sector is precisely to favor it as a whole and is necessarily in conflict aid of a personal or family, where the rationale for aid is to benefit individuals or families who are in certain situations. A good example of the latter would, for example, the same "discount" but granted only to households with an income below a certain value. Therefore, it is definitely understood when we talk about aid to a sector, the beneficiary is the industry itself, albeit tangentially also get some benefit on the consumer, tangentially, I say, because if you get good at a lower price, perhaps the absence of the expectation of lower prices would never have renewed their vehicle.
Yes! Thanks to Zapatero, finally I can buy the car you always wanted.
So, the sector has increased its sales volume and everyone seemed satisfied. But the surprise has come, worse for many people, to begin the campaign of income, where they have been told is that this aid is taxed on income. What explains this?. With some difficulty, the truth and falsehood there dae told by the Government in its day.
If two paragraphs ago we agreed that aid to a sector is not a personal aid, it can hardly taxed in the income tax, taxing it is to obtain income PERSONAL. Of course, the poor fools who have accepted this plan had the ingenious interpretation of the tax thereon: That amount is "discount" was not such, but was a payment that must be done by the city acquiring the vehicle, was met by other (public administration and dealers), which actually is an income received by the city, rent has never gone through their hands. It would be apreço to pay taxes to obtain a college scholarship for developing and destination whose sole purpose is to supplement those with the argument that this amount it should have satisfied the citizen and therefore income (using an action similar to taxation of community fees paid by the tenant within the meaning of home, it pays him when he had to pay me, so it's a perecpción income-).
is true that the law of tax exemption is not listed as getting aid, so we really did not hide the fact. But realistically, hard to believe that any ordinary citizen to know the exact content and accu-rate of the rule, properly interpreted or, alternatively, be counseled, especially when revenues "common" (that do not involve much difficulty) in terms of their settlement, the "normal" people tend to make the income statement under the draft that they sent the tax, so that their contact with the world is zero tax. Seems more credible than a normal person before changing car for what he has heard in the media is simply the dealership that the vehicle has a lower price, and no one will explain the consequences, which can be really harmful to the public.
In short, the income tax has two components, the general base and the base of savings. The first is comprised of certain types of income (such as wages) and are taxed at a progressive rate is applied using a table (which you can see below is the table of the stretch state, it would have to add it to determine tables for each regional autonomy for the section). The second taxed in the current year at a fixed rate (although in such reform is increased from the first 6,000 €) does not take into account what you earn to establish what% will pay. Both have a state section (both percent that "you are charged the State", so to speak) and a regional section (section that defines the CCAA and that "they charge you") whose sum is the amount that ultimately we have to pay the Treasury. Hence, we will discount what we have paid because we have been holding (we have been paying during the year, hence it's "pay or return" if we paid in advance over what we corresponded we returned and if not touch us pay the difference.)
tax base - to Euros
tax payable - Rest
Euros tax base - to Euros
Applicable Type - Percentage
0 0
'20 17,707 15'66 17,707
'20 2,772
'95 '00 15,300 18'27
'20 5,568 33,007 '20 20,400 '00
24'14 '20 53,407 10,492 '82
Thereafter
27'13
State Fee Table
The table varies its figures each fiscal year, but the system is almost the same in order to explain how the euro affects tributene aid rent and its damaging consequences for citizens.
As shown, the table determines the percentage that will apply to the general base. We can put some explanatory purposes:
If I have a taxable income in the general (RBG) below € 17,707 '20, I applied on the amount the 15'66%: Paco has earned, net of Social Security contributions , 15,000 € gross salary in the year to pay off not having other sources of income. Paco is calculated on the income effects of 15'66% of 15,000 €.
Following the structure of the previous example, if € 21,000 (between the second and third section of the table) would pay for the first € 17,107 '20 '95 the amount of 2,772 € and the rest up to € 21,000 would apply to the 18'27%.
assistance for the vehicle is a direct sum of the amount of the general base, for which there is no deductible expense. An example:
Paco has worked until 30 September in Spain Krane Chemical, a company dedicated to the manufacture of pesticides, including the so-called "pillamar5" with a full monthly salary of 1,750 euros. The Social Security contributions satisfied charge amounting to 1,250 euros and the annual membership of the UGT satisfied amounts to 200 euros.
If you have more income, the general base is calculated by adding what has won in Gross minus deductible expenses (social security contributions and unions, to limit the latter), which does not really apply the % to everything we have gained. However, in helping us add all of a sudden the help.
The really bad for the citizen is that if its income was in a section of the table, with that brutal increase "income" is may make the leap to the next level, so all his money from the general basis will be taxed at a higher rate when their real incomes have really been the same. and this, of course, unknown and unable to make suitable provision. For example, someone who was paying a 18 ' 27% applied to all income can go to pay a 24'14% only for the accounting for the help.
As you see, is a lie or half truth of the Government of marketing we have, which sells in the face of public opinion and yet one thing then things are never so.
Regards.
PS: Do not know why the table not centered and the proper size, try to fix it.
You know that this section is intended to bring to light unknown compositions by the public to consider temazos authentic. So far the thing was not bad, but it's time to put your boots and get into the mud of value to recommend things that perhaps other states already have been sentenced to death.
With you ...
The main theme of the episode pilot episode in real image of "Spider-Man" from the 70!
My history with this pilot is long, and I have of my early childhood a VHS with the entire chapter (and not because he appears Elsa Pataki before sex-change, as indicated by the credits ) courtesy of Channel 9. I've seen dozens of times this unclassifiable chapter is simply real shame because I feel very very funny (as well as other masterpieces of the genre superheroes like The Toxic Avenger IV , especially if you see her in the company of colleagues and good cheap bottle of lambrusco Mercadona), highlighting the sequence in which Spider-Man "fight? against some ... "Samurai?. But also, and I blush a little recognized for her music.
I love watching the girls from the top!
always called my attention to rescue the ugly issue of the series of drawings of the 60 to mark the premiere of the film ever Raimi and claimed the great song that Johnnie Spence wrote to his counterpart in real image, a real example of the best music from disc media The Spy Who Loved Me . And when, as a bonus track see in the credits that the musical supervisor is the great John Fresco (credits that you can see below, in which listening to a longer and better version of the theme from minute 5:15).
view of the controversy that has raised the complaint by the Supreme Court, I would summarize my opinion about this, given that since 2008 we discussed the issue in a post larger.
that as it was already mentioned at that time there was something irregular in the opening of criminal proceedings (and I say irregular and unlawful, which is not necessarily the same), it seems appropriate to lead to the same thing, but to bring those legal arguments to the thread of another thought, which is to show, from my point of view, what's important. This, I believe, as in any legal proceedings, are facts and your qualification, leaving everything else as secondary. The facts, which I see are:
- Garzón opened a criminal to find victims of Franco's repression.
- justifies that it is competent to do it and not judge each place branding the deaths as a result of the commission of a crime of genocide and crimes against humanity (as the National Court has jurisdiction to prosecute these crimes, but not murder "common", so to speak).
- Garzón obvious that the officers responsible for those acts are dead (and remember that you can not open criminal cases against dead) and even sought the death certificate of Franco to verify this point.
- Some political parties and associations ultraconservative ideology who complain against their performance on the grounds that to continue the cause, was prevaricate (make a decision knowing the injustice).
- The Supreme Court declared admissible the complaint and two others, one in relation to that did not fail to instruct a case against Emilio Botin having received sponsorship for a conference in the U.S. and another by eavesdropping on conversations with lawyers clients in the context of the plot Gürtel and undue delay.
From these facts have led to many debates arising from the left and right, some defending the actions of the judge and, most importantly, harshly criticizing and insulting those who do not, and others wanting to be guilty and the judge National Court. These discussions have seen everything from journalistic opinions about the ability to instruct Garzón right or wrong Where you go, opinions criticizing the alleged civil guard detachment that is the judge of this group, criticism or praise their way through politics, old grudges, new filias up mass rallies in favor of the Republic where the Supreme Court stated as "Franco" and "accomplice of the torturers."
What I mean is not discussed in depth is, of course, the reality of the relevant facts. Personally I care little who is the one who sued one or another judge and his reasons, what matters is whether the judge has done right or wrong and that end is not yet resolved, from what I understand to talk about what else is absolutely useless and superfluous, another excuse to fill hours and hours of televised debates in which journalists without any legal training categorically say on proceedings.
from the facts, my opinion:
- The actions of Garzon commented on all three fronts are cast doubt on its correctness, as stated in the post "Garzón" and as confirmed by the contributions of the complainants.
- Offer certainly not necessarily mean you have sinned. For example, in the case of competition for rating actions as genocide or crimes against humanity is discussed and controversial legal doctrine, so it hardly can be transgressed by picking an option that offers interpretation of the law, now other elements to consider, there may be some misconduct (eg, knowing that those responsible, for reasons of age, are dead. It would be similar whether Garzón himself opened a case against Pizarro and Cortes, under universal justice for their crimes against indigenous peoples of the Americas).
- This Sivra to point out that I'm not saying that Garzón has transgressed (not for me to say) because it is an issue that is unclear. But precisely because it is not, I do not think it wrong that a court will shed light on the matter.
- Garzón advocates at public think they are wrong, by the way, front, complaining about the fact that things are clarified and not a conviction for trespass.
With all this, I am very concerned about the polarization of the English political spectrum on this issue and the vehemence with which they attack or defend a judge who, regardless of what they say one or the other, has acted in a certain way and that is what will to prosecute. I worry because it makes me wonder what interests are behind to put much meat on the grill in this area.
However, before looking for malicious purposes, you should take the pre-electoral period in which we live. I think the PSOE Zapatero has found the key to his electoral victory in a predominantly left-wing, which is to spur the electorate polarized society and fostering confrontation. And this debate, proclamations the Republic and many other things we've seen these days, I think that answers that, obviously, again, that what matters is the act of the accused and not the political circumstances of the environment.
Today I get an e-mail with which I had so much fun making flattering comparisons of the geeks and their relationship with professors and students in courses taught in my school, something for all tastes and the list is quite extensive, but I prefer the following.
For Internet lovers
're the first in Google when searching my heart. I have the RSS feed of your thoughts.
For Linux users
You are the kernel of my linux
Compilers For those who hate and those who love him (the robot, the PC means dragon)
you my code compiler.
programming For
're the linker of my objects.
For emos
If you let me do Alt-F4 to my life
of Architecture For
When I see my CPU cycle accelerates. Together we are as a dual-core processor
.
For those of sopes
You have the highest priority on my list of processes. You have the highest priority in my PCB (hahaha that good XD) Your words have the lowest IRQ for me.
For those who love QT
Your wish is for me
Signals
For the lab blender
no graphics would render 100% your perfect figure.
File For
have root on my life.
For Network (ammm. .. PPH)
Our hearts Wifi sync.
The most tender and my favorite;)
are always in C: / Mi / Corazón. I want to ping your heart
I leave, as extended, the theme that opened the legendary cartoon series "The Galaxy Rangers" (in Spain, "Guardians of the Galaxy") , titled "No Guts, No Glory" . I think one of the best songs ever made for television series. Also, as you can see in the second video, the song was neither painted with the opening of the series. Finally, I leave also ending the third season, which included another song.
It says, note that our beloved leader Remote Control Camela, Hans Florian Zimmer (pictured) had serious difficulties to compose the soundtrack of Gladiator , rumor becomes true in light of admissions by composer slave on the DVD of the film itself, in the section devoted to music.
Because I am a tsunami! !
(Zimmer during her arranger PopStar Queen)
There the black legend that inspired Zimmer sitting on the toilet bowl to compose the famous song The Battle (legend that rivals the death Jordi Hurtado) and it recognizes additional content mented. In Graimito Corner we take very seriously our little work and we decided to revisit those extras DVD to ascertain the truth and answer the question, "Zimmer said composing sitting on the" throne "?
After an exhaustive search, we can conclude that the final answer, after scanning his voice and check that it is not a fan of Nightwish resentful is that NO said. Then go churro post, right?. Not really. Because Zimmer is more valuable in an interview as saying that it does not say (?). In this magnum opus of investigative journalism, we have found some pearls of wisdom from the German genius about the difficulty of writing songs for a big movie like Gladiator and most importantly, how to overcome them, in a display of self-sufficiency and " divine inspiration." Let them:
- (1.33 minutes) : "My God, composing ... [...] would be wonderful if the Oscar - he won by Lion King little - time before you give the next four bars of the next issue that you compose , because they are impossible. And you sit here and you doubt yourself and think you can not repeat that 're a fraud and you should call now the studio and say "Look for a composer d e truth "- how he likes the good of Hans laughing at myself, huh? -. And suddenly something happens. I do not know how it happens, but suddenly there is something appropriate for the film. [. ..] I have hours of material never heard anyone - why is it? - . [...] bought costumes are like a department store [...] and I'm talking about costumes as . "
- (11'05) : "We read books about Rome (?) . [...] I thought about how civilized Rome and was built on slaves, how compose a theme that embraces this duality?
As we can see, Zimmer was in a dead end. Neither he nor his "black" The Carachunga found something that sounded fairly well and it cost them the least effort . But it seems that the most prodigious minds German from Gunilla Von Bismarck were blocked. Zimmer, in view of what was going to stop, he enrolled in the course of CCC (veinteveintiunoveintidos) taught by none other than James Horner " Cheating is easy and one day had an epiphany. Surely there was something in the emulator that could be used. And it was.
ZIMMER COPY
And how. We can see here, from Minute 1:00 in duration.
"Gustav Holst? But if you do not know who it is!"
What really gives value to the interview is really irrelevant paragraphs which I have transcribed before real meaning to come to light plagiarism by Zimmer (like "And suddenly something happens. I do not know how it happens, but suddenly there is something appropriate for the film").
But the best is yet to come. Vale a composer "borrow" ideas from other, classical or contemporary, but what I find shameful is that over try to take advantage of ignorance musical theater average viewer throw flowers into the pool of talking DVDs the creative process as a costly thing, which has taken much effort to get to write something completely original . Come on, they take us for fools. Do you show? those distributions. Given Zimmer back, explain to the little shame that there are things you have to say how are you:
- (12'29) : "Referring to the" Waltz of the Gladiator "in its initial stage of composition, this is, what HE wrote rather than what you copied, "It worked well the first three seconds, but then I realized that I had embarked on an impossible task - so I decided to steal the ideas to another. But I continued with perseverance and composed this topic unbelievable. " Zimmer, confuse perseverance with Google search.
- (4'33) "About Lisa Gerrard-" It's like finding a musical soul mate, [...] has a great aesthetic sense - like me, because we are soul mates, [...] , all artists today are called, but she is a true artist , really. " Learning flowers lie technique without being fit.
- (13'09) : "No point in making a movie like Gladiator and not risk not going to limit not be reckless" . Indeed, to risk a lawsuit for plagiarism is, of course, fearless.
- (15'18) : "It's great that this film could use my own language , which is much more expressive than words [...]." Zimmer, confusing himself with others and making use again of his legendary modesty, citing, of course, their "Aditional Composers" they did much of the score, to recognize their work.
- (19'24) : "Nobody calls me as much as myself." Experiencing autoexigencia levels unknown to man, down 0.
- (19'50) : "I say, well, I've been up to par, I have not cheated my brothers. "" Zimmer ", meaning German complacency.
" Why did we live without working ... Above and pay me!
Badelt, stop feeding your grandmother dying and get to currar I have to buy pants pistachio in the Christmas sales. "
Anyway, as you can see, it embarrassing someone to do their work plagiarizing the other or "inspired" as the politically correct, more shameful is that you also want to go through fool procalamando from the rooftops how hard it was your creative process, also the lack of mention of people who do much of the work to so-called "German Genius." The trouble with talking to a camera is that things are recorded and serve to demonstrate how common (and hidden) of "divine inspiration" to have some composers of film music. Worst of all is that Hans Zimmer is a composer of talent , although often self-referential sinning and not properly credited to their "black", known to film music. Only on such occasions, do not feel like using. And to top it off, I like his music.
Saludetes
PD demagógica :¿Donde está la SGAE en estos casos?
Bonus track Zimmer y la sexualidad
-(0'25): "Pensé en hombres con faldas y sandalias y me eché a reir...[...] pensé: esto puede ser bueno".
-(11'15): "Lo que hace un compositor es desnudarse continuamente, [...] permitir que los demás vean sus secretos profundos y ocultos ".
not forget to visit http://cineybso.com 
not forget to visit http://cineybso.com 
not forget to visit http://cineybso.com 
not forget to visit http://cineybso.com 
not forget to visit http://cineybso.com 
not forget to visit http://cineybso.com 
not forget to visit http://cineybso.com 
not forget to visit http://cineybso.com 
