Hi all,
Before anyone point demagogy of the title, saying that what I'm going to talk about is the thesis that has kept the CEOE that economic recovery requires the lowering of dismissal, as stated in the previous post.
The crux of the matter is that since this famous chaired by another employer equally famous entrepreneur , Gerardo Diaz Ferrán (pictured) has said over and over again (which prevents it from being considered a mistake or an error) which is necessary for the English business sector to recover, and with it employment, it is necessary " reduce the cost of dismissal "dry dismissal, without adjectives. Such a thing has not been well received by workers and unions, of course. But following the English tradition, it has resorted to telling lies that really looking to try to convince the injured not get hurt. Come on, the implementation of the strategy of "Guzmán el Bueno" so many other English institutions have used in the past and even today days, from the Government to the Constitutional Court: Let pounding her well, but do not worry if we stop to explain, will believe it appropriate to do so.
The culmination of this strategy is put into the collective thought the following idea which ignores a wealth of information:
to me, a businessman, I is very expensive to fire a worker- 45 days per year worked, "what my economic recovery difficult and prevents me from hiring more people, both by spending generated as dismissal for trying to avoid having to lay in the future people giving the job now. This, however, does not mean a cut in workers' rights and guarantees at all. You, the unions are wrong. What happens if you do not cheapen the dismissal is that then we have to employ people on temporary contracts, we can not hire permanent because it is very expensive to dismiss. You know that the time simply did not renew the contract. So let's just say I get a much smaller compensation than no. This is good for you boys. And no, it will give us thanks for being so generous, do not deserve.
This is more or less, which from CEOE has been said (1) . But it is curious that some men who are dedicated to the business world can not even specify what type of dismissal want cheaper, although it is not difficult to guess the meaning of the compensation that incomplete quote (45 days per year worked, selfishly ignoring the monthly cap .) Perhaps because to do so, they would duster.
Ladies and Gentlemen, what ladies and gentlemen of the CEOE want to cheapen the Unfair dismissal, which is that when the worker has no responsibility or fault in the dismissal and, moreover, is that when the law does not recognize as justified dismissal. In other words, is when the employer decides to arbitrarily and unjustifiably take the fucking street the worker. No more. There is no debate, because there is no other compensation accompanying dismissal citing the CEOE.
It is more wicked than the unsustainable economic conditions make this type of dismissal, or whatever it is, who can not afford to cut that cost templates. It is, as I said, perverse, because the businesses that have financial problems to justify the dismissal of a worker can turn to PURPOSE OF JOB (up to a certain amount of layoffs in a specified time frame) or known REGULATION OF EMPLOYMENT RECORD (ERE) (if many workers, to understand), which allows to fire a worker for reasons esconómicas with compensation of only 20 days per year worked with a corresponding monthly limit.
What happens is that in order to access these figures, it is necessary to prove with extensive documentation accounting hardship status of the company, which sheds light on your accounts and actions, to what many employers do not want exposure because they have things to hide.
In short, the cessation of the milongas and say, bluntly, that they want to keep fucking the average worker. but worse, as I said, is that they would have us go over all stupid and or convince us that this is accepted, or no work . Sure. And they are sisters of charity.
(1) : "The layoffs, which now is more expensive, it prevents small businesses get more workers" , "The management has found that, Finally, in court this workers' compensation rises to 45 days. "
not forget to visit http://cineybso.com 
0 comments:
Post a Comment