Approximate Price For Liability Insurance Of 1 M

Two examples of low professionalism of our journalists: (I) Introduction and Sauca

Hello everyone,

In Spain there are three major interrelated problems that hinder our progress as a state, namely: a) as a people, we are sleepy intellectually and our level of social demand is really low, besides being involved in a process aldeanización transpires to the sound of what about mine? on issues that affect us all; b) the press, which should exert a work in any field information with accuracy and precision, is little more than a transmission belt plurifica political slogans and ideas that flow directly their masters or information without contrast which urban legend come true, so that its audit work and social policy is destroyed and c) the political class as a result of the absence of vigilant citizens and journalists real made and unmade at will, impoverishing the civil society, dishonoring the public and preventing the real development. It's about the second issue on which I now put the spotlight.

is easy to agree that the main task of the journalist is to inform, even before that of opinion, as to assess their opinions before we know what you think about . To report, the journalist must gathering information, but this is not enough, must submit to a trial value, an accuracy rating if it is not possible to verify its accuracy with precision, ruling that does not exceed this trial and that issuing the professional information to consider. Moreover, in the faculty the journalist is taught to do just that, to select and process the information it manages. Thus the difference between a journalist and a contertulio bar or coffee anyone is that while the prosecution first external information and expands the second trial issues of value on an event or situation affecting over obtaining personal information, which will have a value determined by the origin of this information (for example, a surgeon can discuss over coffee matters within his field and his opinion is qualified, if the discussion is about the same and the raider it brings to the table views based on what your neighbor has told devoted to trade Florists, opinion is not qualified, but is entitled to express it). This means that in the case of contertulio is the interlocutor who must ponder what gives importance to the trial of security issued. However, the journalist when he presents the information, it is assumed that at least knows what he's talking , because its function is to distribute accurate information to society, despite the redundancy, as a country have an informed society, of no use if the journalist disseminates false. What justifies the existence of the journalist is just spare the city the task of figuring out what is happening and to filter what is true or unquestionably true of false.

I said in the previous paragraph is an obstacle to its credibility by looking at the reality of the media in Spain and the generality of professionals who work in them, or at least the vast majority of which write or speak in the most popular newspaper, radio and television. I mean inevitably to the generality of professionals from the sector because it traditionally has been a subtle difference between the serious press and other media, be identified first with total clarity the major general newspapers (El País, El Mundo, La Vanguardia ...) and related media, encompassing the second to and tabloid gossip, leaving a sort of limbo in the sports media and event, because neither is as bad as information "heart" or is so serious and chronic policy. What sí es común es la omnipresente frase "yo soy periodista" en cuanto se pone en duda la tarea de cualquiera de ellos, como si dedicarse a esa profesión les diera un carnet de ser superior y una autoridad moral que autoriza a decir cualquier cosa porque "es información" o "a la gente le interesa este asunto". Lo cual pone en evidencia que, a diferencia de lo que nos quieren hacer creer, es la profesión de periodista en España la que está perdiendo, porque sea cual sea la naturaleza de la información con que se trata, en todos los campos podemos atisbar ejemplos de periodistas con cargos de responsabilidad al frente de programas con gran audiencia o en medios de referencia que en absoluto se toman en serio lo que exponíamos in the second paragraph. They are to journalism what the law would be a lawyer who was unaware of any legal standard.

This pluricidad of sectors of the press that there are bad journalists realize two significant examples, we discuss below:

in the treatment of sports becomings there are many examples of information biased, unabashedly concerned, puerile and designed and written for readers stupid and few of the opposite (although any, Hayles ), more if we talk about football, both in the press Madrid (also called by some, following English tradition of demonizing the enemy, the English media cave ) in the press of Barcelona. I feel bad Although the overall low quality of mainstream and citizen media despotism, my level of anger is much less than when I see the same lack of rigor and preparation on public television, one that (now I) hold with all taxes. The reason is that ultimately the private media need desperately to sell papers / generate audience because they live it, not excusable, but understandable. What unsettles me is that a TV as the 1, no advertising RTVE and should, in all cases and sometimes not, focus on quality, hold as sports editor and as narrator in the Champions League matches to Sauca Sergio (pictured).

Sauca is one of those TV characters you do not know what to do there, because up to be an incompetent must have talent. Although the fund should not lack the virtues, because to get where he has come to be as bad as a journalist at least certainly excels in the art of the rectum lameteo . And before you call me too much, I'll tell you what is the perfect example bad journalist that I referred, referring to the discussion in the excellent book blog Van Gaal, because of the attitude of Sauca during the broadcast of Real Madrid - Milan:

"retransmission Real Madrid-Milan was again a year of neglect, with Sergio Sauca as master of ceremonies. A clear example of dispassionate communicator and can not bring anything interesting to the viewer. [...] The highlight came with the enter the field of Kevin-Prince Boateng, Ghanaian international whose family history is well known since the last World Cup ( own note: Kevin-Prince Boateng is the brother of Jerome Boateng, the first Ghanaian play with the selection and the second with Germany and they are fighting. Both teams played the World Cup and is well known that "curiosity") . [...] [...] Sauca confused this time with Kevin-Prince with his brother Jerome, who plays for Manchester City. A rabbit is committed by anyone, but this was not serious. After a few minutes until someone had to warn Sauca of error. This, shamelessly, called on his colleagues in the study to confirm whether Kevin-Prince was the brother who plays with Ghana or playing with Germany. Both the commentator, Manolo Sanchis, as the three editors located in the box and the bench did exits through the forum. None of the five had no idea. When he finally got the confirmation that Kevin-Prince plays Ghana, Sauca again jump into the mud, "Your brother, who plays for Germany, I think it is at Werder Bremen."

sure many think is a simple mistake, no big deal. And you will be on your right. But that does not prevent it disturbing that a sportswriter, that is, specialized, has not followed an event the likes of World Cup, you do not know in general the staff of one of the leading teams in Europe such as Milan, which, having a team of writers who can document about players, not read what you are prepared or there is no such report, prepare yourself, who, being in the era of new technologies and by having a laptop, Sauca not fit into Google and out of doubt, because, as you see in the pictures, putting "Boateng" in the famous search engine displayed the two brothers and do as well, with clear signs indicating how distinctive military equipment (Kevin Prince Jerôme the first and second) and finally, that without clear this point, put a comment making the wiseacre.

is not, therefore, the error itself, but the lack of preparation and processing of information so critical. Because this man get paid to know more than their viewers, to bring something, because to not provide anything better to watch the game without audio. So if this man does not know more than I do when I see a game (which I usually get my boxes), milk, put to a known, it is not so difficult. Almost all sports bloggers have more extensive knowledge of international football that many alleged journalists. At least more than Eduardo Inda, current supreme juntaletras director of sports daily Marca, which also confused in an editorial to Nigel DeJong, who plays for Manchester City and international black for the Netherlands with Ajax player DeJong, blond guy, fair skin and blue eyes and little or nothing to do with the old. But at least I can punish him by not buying or reading his newspaper website, but is already Sauca?.

What is worse is not the first time the Sauca Sergio good does a bad job, like when Wayne Rooney Kevin Rooney called or named him as Carles Puyol Puyol Francesc. Although not necessary to go back as far back in the same match in which he brought with him from Boateng, eventually concluding that Kevin-Prince is the Gahn plays.

I would be high time that someone TVE call attention to this man who even sends people to see the competing programs, such as when English mistook the World with Street. In the video (also of THE BOOK OF VAN GAAL) can see how it is not a mere slip, but directly not know which program is that it has targeted and has not given the real "Ghana" (pardon the joke easy, I had to) learn to speak or mirárselo before.

I wonder why, like José Manuel Díaz , what have they done guys like Sauca or as the narrator of Channel 9 the other day, casualmenteen in Milan - Real Madrid, delighted us with her wit repeating over and over again that Filippo "Pippo" Inzaghi played a ball that actually did the relay teammate Ruben "Pipo" Deck, former Valencia player, ending with a fireworks worthy of the Fallas in Valencia in humor and laughed saying, before the two goals scored by Inzaghi, who (I translate from Valencia) - the "Pippo" has done to Real Madrid pupa "Pipa" - making mistakes and not just thinking that was funny, but not realize that "El Pipa" Higuain is the father of Real Madrid player, which it is known as "El Pipit".

Maybe and just maybe, tomorrow we see on public television (all) professionals who deserve to be there. Regards

not forget to visit http://cineybso.com

How Long Do Cramps Last In Early Pregnancy

Sergio George Lucas and charismatic villains: Value Mortal (II) Two half-truths

continue with the second installment of the post dedicated to the villains that George Lucas has squandered over the participation in Star Wars. The earlier you can find it here. Let's talk about Darth Maul and Palpatine.

Darth Maul

When the talk turns to charismatic villains that good Lucas has failed to treat or give them due weight, we all come to mind surely the name of Darth Maul. The Sith of the double-bladed sword is the paradigm of road that has been touring the new series, in which the quality of the artistic design of characters and settings have been greatest in exchange for a total reluctance about the script and character development. Notably, not something to be amazed if we understand that Luke is not and never has been a director who knows how to bring the actors. The mythical story is told in the extras of the classic trilogy on DVD in which Harrison Ford and Irvin Kershner tell how Lucas simply said "Do it!. I put there, you just do it" in the sense that it simply actors had read the script and you're done. The basic Differents between the classic trilogy and is current at that Lucas was not synonymous with God, but that was with a crew and actors when they said something was not working; paradigm is the best of the six movies is The Empire Strikes Back, the only one not addressed it. In the development of the first three episodes we see how the technical team designed items with hard work, after weeks of work, displayed almost frightened by Lucas their work while it merely means "not.. That one. Very well, we will continue in three weeks. " Therefore, no one to control mania in Lucas in front of the saga, we have are movies that seal in which the general argument of the film (and I stress the "general" in the sense of "broadly ") and the artwork is the most important thing, forgetting the interpretation of the actors and the motivation of the characters through the neglect of the main weapon of the classic trilogy: his brilliant dialogue, in a few lines defining the nature of the characters and their motivations, to the point of making such absurd credible cold streams as the annihilation of the planet Alderaan and the almost imperceptible signs of pain Leia Pirncesa beyond a shy "nooooo". The agile dialogues serve both to explain the historical references found (lesson teacher Obi-Wan on Tatooine to resume in less than 5 minutes all you need to know) as to frame the characters (Han Solo works almost from the first minute). Thing that shines by its absence in the new trilogy.

That said, follow those same guidelines. Her presence is captivating and enigmatic, the result of his great design that brings a level of charisma brutal. This is greatly appreciated in combat that takes place at the end of Episode I between Maul and the two Jedi. If the classic trilogy as important in fighting duels was not itself but the dialogue and the meaning it had (and, in Episode IV to the conversation between Darth Vader and Obi-Wan; in the V's intention not to kill Vader and Luke's final revelation and VI that the real significance is that Luke duel against itself) in this truly impressive is the choreography, that is, grief itself that establishes two things at a superficial level but clear: 1) The Jedi are very good at handling the lightsaber and 2) Darth Maul is even better and is against the ropes most of the fight. Therefore, this factor of enemy skilled in the arts, skilled and silent Darth Maul gives a perfect aura. For that reason and nothing else then was admired by fans, who wanted to know more about him.

The truth is that despite its popularity, it met the standard except that Darth Vader, all charismatic villain of Star Wars should disappear. The last show hidden Maul and uncertainties about their abilities and motivations as Sith were not enough to recover and Lucas decided to add depth to the character, since it was also easily insertable in Episode II both continuity and by the characteristics of the character: in the first question because we are in a universe full of technology that can be used as a reason of his "resurrection" and the second one, I hardly think that a person skilled in the infiltration and the battle can not get into the plot of attempted murder and alleged intrigue EADLC.

Palpatine

First of all should specify that I mean we saw Emperor Palpatine in Return of the Jedi, as there is a superb villain, very evil and wicked as it fulfills its role in the story to perfection, which is none other than being someone worse than Darth Vader for it to upper end the evil and redemption. Where I think is missed is firmly in the new trilogy, seized the title of this post syndrome and before we developed when we were talking about Darth Maul.

Moving on, maybe I can be rash to say that is a villain that has been extracted all the juice in the new series because, in fact, appears on all new films and make an Machiavellian plan to destroy the Jedi ... or not. Because I understand your machiavellian has nothing, as Machiavelli might be cynical but it was also an intelligent man who judged the passions of men with ease. In my opinion, the loose script of the first three episodes galactic simplifies too much the alleged plan of Palpatine to seize power and become ancillary things that should be important (for example, in the movie Revenge of the Sith is not appreciated with certainty the importance that should be Anakin Skywalker in his plans or the determinant of their treachery, as the vast majority of the dirty work are clones do by enacting the Order 66). I think also of extreme simplicity whole process of persuasion Anakin Skywalker, as the result of creative schizophrenia of George Lucas and final assembly of the film, intermingle decomposed the three bases to give Anakin over to the dark side of the Force: 1) Palpatine can provide the power to save his wife, 2) Palpatine convinced Anakin that the Jedi are not really a force for good and want to galactic domination and 3) Anakin is jealous (love) because he believes that Obi-Wan flirts with Amidala. Of these three, only the latter was finally removed from the film. But this does not remedy the deeply artificial result that Anakin knows Palpatine is a Sith Lord and, therefore is evil, that same knowledge to infer that the only thing that takes Anakin to accept the teachings of Palpatine (which, incidentally, are conspicuous by their absence in the movie) is his immeasurable love for Padme and not, conversely , establishing that the Jedi are evil and are planning to overthrow him, who appears in the final conversation with Obi-Wan, is an argument that lies in the minds of the young Sith. And this without addressing the holes in his supposed plan is foolproof, holes, though, that the Expanded Universe has been in charge of covering tying loose ends that seemed or action that seemed very left to chance. But keep in mind that here we are talking about George Lucas's relationship with its villains and you have to give George Lucas certainly knows little or nothing, or is aware of what is happening in your porpio Universe. Some evidence is in that sense, at least, as when he says in the comments of LVDLS Grievous coughs at the conceptual stage because I wanted a character in "sick", ignoring the fact that the droid General such thing as Mace Windu crushed his chest at the end of the first Clone Wars series.

So, if Palpatine's plan is simple and persuasive skills leave much to be desired, I understand that this impacts negatively on the character, that someone should be displayed as infallible, which acts almost mechanically, and that really causes a profound transformation and reasoned well as an agent of Anakin Skywalker. Do not be a villain operetta easy and predictable.

The next installment will end with the characters and not wasted, but certainly ridiculed, they are not few.

Regards!

PS: I edit to clarify that in Return of the Jedi Richard Marquand is credited director, but in view of Luke's comments about the shooting ("In the end it was quicker to go and do it myself than let what do others ") makes it quite clear that who is really behind the camera is it, hence to say that Episode V is the only one not directed by him.

not forget to visit http://cineybso.com

Lice And Pregnant Woman

WTF Moment

As the Tico who can not remember his name: "If you're not learning or having fun you're wasting time," it comes out that at this time do not know if I'm doing one or none of the above. Hahaha




ESET = ES ET xD